DAP lauches Ubah TV, says media freedom is not 10 minutes on RTM

29 March, 2013

KUALA LUMPUR, 29 March: DAP today launched its free internet TV channel, Ubah TV even as the ground heats up ahead of the 2013 general election. At the launch by DAP Secretary General Lim Guan Eng in the DAP Headquarters this morning, members of the press were treated to a preview of a mock-up television screen seen to be inside the eye of the hornbill mascot.

Lim said the TV channel was launched as a response to the ruling Barisan Nasional government’s near total monopoly of media.

“We rely on Ubah TV to break the monopoly of lies and distortion by BN. We are not sure if we can break it but we must create a space for all parties to give their views and perspectives,” he said.

“10 minutes on RTM is not media freedom”

Lim who is also Penang Chief Minister, pointed out that the mainstream media is controlled by the government and does not offer the right of reply to parties other than the government. He added that the media often used lies and spin to defame and smear DAP, PKR and PAS leaders and their parties with false accusations.

“Instead of reporting both sides of the story, they (Information Minister Rais Yatim) offer us 10 minutes airtime to campaign for the election. We do not ask for 10 minutes, we want the right to defend ourselves against the lies, abuse and defamation hurled against us on prime time TV everyday.”

According to Lim, Rais’ offer of 10 minutes airtime to opposition parties is an insult to democracy and press freedom. He stressed that if the government was serious in practicing true media freedom, the right of open airspace and fair reporting should be a continuous and long term effort.

DAP, PKR and PAS have rejected the 10 minutes offer on the basis of these principles. However, MCA has chided the parties for snubbing the offer, saying that 10 minutes is “more than enough” if the opposition has a “solid” argument.

Lim begged to differ, saying that issues of media freedom and democracy should not be treated like instant noodles.

“What can you do in 10 minutes? You can only cook maggi mee, nothing else. Democracy is not like cooking maggi mee,” Lim jested.

Lim stressed that jostling for media space was not a competition to see who could come up with more falsehoods or hurl more accusations or sow more hatred.

“We want a chance to explain our policies which bring hope to all Malaysians,” he said.

Let Najib appear on Ubah TV

In contrast to the mainstream media, the DAP Secretary General said that Ubah TV intends to make truth-telling its guiding principle and would lead by example to give the other side a right of reply.

“We would like to invite Prime Minister Najib Razak as the first guest on Ubah TV. He can come to debate with Anwar Ibrahim, or he can come alone.”

Lim stressed that Ubah TV would strive to give a chance to their detractors to appear on its TV programs according to the principles of fairness and accurate reportage.

He hoped that in telling the truth, Ubah TV would offer a reliable source of alternative media to the people, especially during the upcoming 2013 general election.

This would help the people make an informed choice with the correct information, he said.

“In order to make an informed decision about which party to select, voters must do this based on facts and truth. So we want to make the truth known and the truth will set us free,” Lim said.

Also present at the press conference were DAP National Publicity Secretary Tony Pua, DAP Assistant National Publicity Secretary Teo Nie Ching, DAP National Treasurer Fong Kui Lun and DAP Deputy Chairman Tan Kok Wai. Lim appeared shy when asked to greet viewers at home who were watching the launch being broadcasted live on ubah.tv , he jokingly attributed the awkwardness to the fact that he was “not a TV star”.

Viewers can expect to see live footage from all around the nation from election campaign activities, pre-recorded interviews, special focus analysis and coverage of the election results as the news breaks. The internet TV channel will run around the clock during the general election. Viewers can access the station at ubah.tv or follow the station on twitter @ubahtv -The Rocket

This article was written by on Friday, March 29, 2013 at 12:36 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


  • askanchung

    i like DAP

  • Ong Kean Wah

    I understand that our GE13 is most dirty in m’sia history.it very pity that all citizens had push so hard but with dirty trick it rob from .in world that is no other ways that can boycott this type election and can agree on that election .Can our berhormat Agung do something in order to help our Malaysian to fight each other I assume this will come next .if our berhormat Agung had power to call re- election again. This cunning berhormat M n N they will not simply give out .caus their right n left hand is surround with his people’s .unless there is civil war which they will create to be I predictition this will happen in M’sia
    Looking on GE 13 they already shown their power to all Malaysia n dirtiest of all .all no one can opposes them.

Leave a Reply

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →