People’s money, Taib’s fief?

3 August, 2012

Taib Mahmud’s alleged billions of wealth is already well-known in Sarawak and Malaysia. Below we list some of the projects which his businesses received in rather dubious circumstances and the opulent lifestyles his family flaunted that would make many UMNO’s politicians salivate with envy. These have been reported but never highlighted in the government-controlled mainstream media.

 

 

 

 

Family Business

According to Bruno Manser Fund, Taib’s family members owned more than 330 companies in Malaysia. The most prominent ones are Cahya Mata Sarawak (CMS), Naim Cendera and Ta Ann.

  • CMS, 29.3% owned by Taib’s family, is the main contractor for most state construction projects, such as cement supply and construction materials, steel, construction and road maintenance in Sarawak.
  • Naim Cendera, another listed company, is heavily involved in the property construction in Sarawak. It is the largest listed bumiputera contractor company.
  • Ta Ann, one of Malaysia’s biggest timber companies, is run by Taib’s family member. It is having troubles with natives in Australia and Sarawak for incursion into native land.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kuching Isthmus

  • A new township development situated 8 km from Kuching city, it consist of 275 acres owned by CMS.
  • The land was alienated to CMS for work done on government projects as payment in kind at a low RM 220,000/ acre cost.
  • Borneo Convention Centre Kuching (BCCK) was built here, costing the state RM 196 million, without open tender.
  • SESCO, the state utility company, also constructed its new HQ here. It bought its five-acre size land here at RM 4 million per acre, 18 times CMS’s original purchase price.
  • One bridge costing the state RM 115 million is being built to connect the isthmus to Kuching area. A second bridge is in the pipeline. All built by CMS companies.
  • When all the main projects are finished the township may potentially be worth billions of ringgit, majority-owned by one family.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bridge Building

  • Bridge building has also been monopolised by Taib’s businesses. In 2001, Titanium Management Sdn Bhd (TMSB) was contracted to construct 384 bridges at the price of RM551 million.
  • By end 2006, TMSB constructed only 322 bridges but billed the state government RM947 million. i.e. 62 bridges less but RM396 million more
  • The state paid RM700 million in cash and alienated 2 parcels of state lands to TMSB’s nominated companies for the remainder.
  • The 1st land parcel was valued at RM 80 million (current market value – RM 400 million). The 2nd alienation involved more than 100,000 acres of plantation land valued at RM 300/acre, (market value – RM 3,500-4,000/acre)
  • In total the state government lost around RM 1 billion in foregone revenue due to the payment in kind
  • From 2007 to 2011, 84.6% of the Sarawak state government’s bridge construction projects were awarded to Taib’s businesses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Very Expensive Divorce

  • Eldest son, Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib and former wife Shahnaz A Majid is involved in a syariah court divorce. Shahnaz is suing Mahmud Bekir for RM 400 million
  • Shahnaz claims the couple own many property residences, thousands of hectares of land in Sarawak, Bukit Tunku land in Kuala Lumpur, 7 luxury cars (Lamborghini, Ferrari, Bentley and Maserati), joint assets of shares in 15 companies including Cahaya Mata Sarawak and Sarawak Cable Bhd.
This article was written by on Friday, August 3, 2012 at 2:46 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

A case of the nose not pointed, the cheeks are pushed outwards

31 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Mohd Ariff Sabri, Raub MP This thing about Khalid Ibrahim and PAS’s conduct as being one of the nose not pointed, the cheeks being pushed forward. (hidung tak mancung, pipi tersorong sorong). Let me begin by saying that PAS is a valued partner within the PR fraternity. Its leadership, ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →