The Young and the Restless

2 March, 2012

The youth being the future of Malaysia is not just a figure of speech. With more than 70 percent of Malaysians under age 40 and below, their aspirations and voting choice will decide the future of the country. The Rocket’s T.K Tan asked DAP parliamentary leader and Ipoh Timur MP Lim Kit Siang his views on the youths’ apathy and what can stir their imagination for change.

Presented with the quip, “Are Malaysian politicians addressing the issues youths are interested in – jobs, fulfilment, social mobility?” Kit Siang goes into a deep thought before answering. Admittedly, it’s a big question.

There are several minuses that have handicapped the youths’ desire to express themselves, the flawed educational policies by the government being one of them. Deserving students being denied entrance to universities and scholarships and the standards and reputation of the universities themselves are declining, hence leading to low job prospects.

These are some factors that are contributing to the stagnating prospects for them in terms of jobs, life fulfilment and social mobility. The youth are looking for room for self expression; the government and society has to provide the room and space for their views and interest on public and nation affairs,” he said.

However the current government has clearly not done that. In fact there is the threat of the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) dangling over the agitated youths who want to voice out against the injustice in the system.

Decades of UUCA abuse have led to the students and by extension even those who have graduated to have aversion to public involvement in voicing out against the authorities’ wrongdoing and injustice. The fear of government reprisals and backlash, losing out on good job prospects has bred an atmosphere of timidity,” Kit Siang elaborated.

Political apathy

According to an internal poll performed by BN last year, political apathy amongst youth is very high. How do we get them interested in nation’s affairs? “The removal of restrictive laws and regulations will go a long way towards fostering youth participation in nation’s affairs.”

As for the current PR state’s efforts in reaching out to the youths, “whatever that can attract the youths’ attention, there has to be a sustained and conscientious efforts to reach out to them,” he continued.

Programs that cater to their needs will need to be implemented to attract their participation. It is a gargantuan task but he notes that political apathy is also prevalent in many countries around the world as well.

All is not lost though; he notes that the Bersih 2.0 demonstration stirred many youths’ interest briefly. Will more Bersih-type rallies do the trick? Only time can tell.

Does the message of change resonate with them? “If the youth realises the downward spiral of this nation is attributed to the high-handed and repressive policies and hegemony of UMNO’ rule, then perhaps the message of change will take root with them and they themselves will begin to take up the baton and propagate it,” he said.

As to whether the spate of student protests shown in the Adam Adli, Safwan, and Bukhairy incidents are a breath of fresh air in Malaysian student activism, he nods. “We may be witnessing a new beginning and awareness of student activism and perhaps even a foreshadow of a Malaysian Spring in the making.”

Cyber war

How much impact would the cyber war have on voters’ psyche, even for rural youths? For all the hype about the coming general elections (GE) being touted as one that will be won and lost in the cybersphere, the veteran DAP leader thinks there is a caveat to the oft-repeated coffee talk that the cyberspace is definitely in PR’s favour.

It all depends on which segment of news users one is discussing about. Admittedly the number of those who are connected to the internet and not dependent on the mainstream newspapers are growing, it may be important.”

However we have witnessed the news vine in the internet to be one of exaggerations, be it pro-BN or pro-PR news pieces. The key will be the internet news users’ ability to discern the validity of the news, not to be pulled by the nose on the lies and falsehoods generated,” he cautioned.

Kit Siang believes Malaysians are by and large wise enough to discern such lies. “The people will initially be duped by such news hyperbole and buzz. The society has to go through the whole spectrum of wholesale acceptance, disillusionment, scepticism and finally discernment of the news vine generated. It will be the hallmark of a nation that has matured in its political process.”

As to the public and by extension the youths’ interest in wanting to know more about the truth, Lim believes society has to inculcate the whistle-blowing culture whereby more whistleblowers would have the courage to shed light on wrongdoings in public institutions for society’s good.

This can only take place when legal protection for whistle-blowers is strengthened and enforcement agencies such as the MACC and police force really get to the bottom of scandals and not play cover-up for the powers-that-be.”

Stirring their imagination

How can PR stir their imagination? Youths all over the world have treaded the same path: the change has to come from them. “The challenge for PR in attracting the youths’ support is to convince them to claim the ownership and stake in making a change in the nation for a better future. DAP in particular needs to be seen as being able to articulate their views and concerns,” he explains.

Statistics shows that more than 70 percent of Malaysians are below 40 and have no memories and baggage of the May 13 stigma. As a first-hand observer and victim of BN’s bogeymen tactics in smearing DAP as the instigator of the racial riots, Lim wants Malaysian youths to break out of this debilitating psyche.

For many decades, the spectre of the May 13 racial riots has been used and abused by the BN government to stunt the growth of democracy and unity as a nation in Malaysia. It is time for the youths to break free and demand change for a better tomorrow and fulfil Malaysia’s destiny to be a country that can stand tall and proud,” says Kit Siang.

Starting Young

A towering political giant, Kit Siang’s list of achievements will leave many marvelling at his tenacity and attitude in striving for success. After finishing his O-levels examination in Batu Pahat High School in Johor, he worked as a teacher and journalist.

He became the secretary general of the Singapore (then part of Malaysia) chapter of National Union of Journalists at age 22. His interest in politics saw him becoming the political secretary to Devan Nair (the first DAP secretary general) and also taking the role of DAP national organising secretary at the tender age of 25.

Apart from being Nair’s political secretary and being involved in setting up DAP branches throughout the country, he was also the first Rocket editor in 1966. By then he was already a husband and father of four young children.

No mention of this man’s extraordinary career would be complete without the May 1969 elections result and its aftermath, which launched his political career. After winning the Bandar Melaka parliamentary seat he was subsequently detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for 15 months, he was released only in October 1970.

In the midst of his ISA detention, the DAP central leadership appointed him as the party’s secretary general. Kit Siang was to be elected to the position continuously till 1999. By 1973, he was appointed the country’s opposition leader, a post he was to hold intermittently from 1973 to 1999.

At an age where many 30-somethings today have yet to chart their life course, at thirty Kit Siang became the face of Malaysian opposition politics, fighting valiantly against BN’s hegemony and exposing many public wrongdoings. It cemented his position as a pre-eminent politician and statesman of Malaysia.

Role Model

This reporter’s awe and curiosity led to the inevitable query that would be on the minds of many young people:

How did you manage it all, with a family of five and the largest opposition party in the country to take care of?

If one has a heart and soul for it, he will make it. There was obviously a lot of sacrifice to be made in terms of being physically away from the family. But I made it a point to call my wife and children everyday. Despite my physical absences, they managed to feel that I was around for them in moral support.

With so many setbacks for DAP and you through the years, was there ever any thoughts of quitting?

Of course on certain days it was a struggle to continue. When I was in detention there were thoughts of depression and giving in. But I felt that as a Malaysian, every one of us can and should fight for justice, change and improvement for the country.

Any pearls of wisdom to share with aspiring politicians?

They have to have the stamina and perseverance to last the journey; as well as commitment and sincerity in serving the people. It is a long journey.

 Green Field For The Taking

A constant gripe on the lips of those with certain vintage is that the youths lack interest in national and current affairs. A survey conducted on youths in Malaysia by Merdeka Centre and the Asian Foundation at the end of 2008 shows otherwise.

53 percent of the youths surveyed read newspaper for news. When asked if they trusted or distrusted the mainstream media (MSM) reporting on the political and current issues, only 5 percent show lack of knowledge or no response to the question (National Youth Survey (NYS) 2008). This is a clear indication that youths are informed about the general affairs of the country.

However it is true that political apathy amongst the young is commonplace. More than 70 percent of 4.2 million unregistered voters at the end of 2010 are between 21 and 40 years old.

The same survey shows that only 64 percent of youths believed that their votes make a difference in influencing the government, a drop of 16 percent from the same poll a year before. There is a discernible sense of disillusionment amongst these youths with the country’s system of governance.

Political apathy may have also translated into political indecision among them. Even in an upbeat internal poll survey by the BN Youth Lab conducted in 2010, while 24 percent professed support for BN and 11 percent for Pakatan, an overwhelming 65 percent were undecided on their political preferences (China Press 28 August 2011). Since 2008, many youth opinion polls conducted shows similar results.

The fact is many youths are no longer susceptible to MSM propaganda or biased news coverage. 49 percent of those surveyed in the NYS survey distrusted the MSM reporting of political and current issues. Many youths today get their news feed from the internet and alternative sources.

Competition is fierce

The big number of undecided youths shows they are getting impatient with both BN and PR. This contest for the young voters is crucial, and the Najib administration knows it. BN head honchos have been busy initiating many youth-oriented programs and initiatives.

The BN Youth Fair and Million Youth Gathering were attempts to address the primary concerns of youth – the quest for a job and life fulfilment. Najib’s Twitter and Facebook pages are some of the most highly visited social media pages in Malaysia.

These initiatives are showing results: according to a poll by Che Hamdan Mohamed Razali, a lecturer of UiTM (Universiti Teknologi Mara) Terengganu, 70 percent of the poll respondents felt comfortable with the government (Bernama 25 December 2011).

The fight for young voters will either propel PR’s ascendancy to Putrajaya or show it to be a one-term wonder in the next coming GE. How will it play out? Well, the writing is already on the wall.

Youth of Malaysia

  • 71.5 % of Malaysians are below 40 years old (2010 Census)
  • More than 70 % of 4.2 million unregistered voters are below 40 years old
  • 70 % have internet access (NYS 2008 survey)
  • 65 % have no political preference (BN Youth Lab Survey, July 2010)
  • 77 % want a multi-racial party to represent them (NYS 2008 Survey)
This article was written by on Friday, March 2, 2012 at 8:08 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →