Second Combat

8 August, 2012


by Izmil Amri

No , I have never been a fan of punk rock. When I was in school, we were prohibited from being in contact with any music playing apparatus. The only music allowed came from the PA system, controlled from the warden’s office, by devotees of nasyid within the structure of the school prefects. So, no; I have no idea what punk rock is. What more ‘straight edge’ and ‘hardcore’ music.

The only other alternative music I had the chance to listen to came from a smuggled walkman, playing Master of Puppets over and over again, from under the pillow, after lights out at 11. So again no, my knowledge of music is very much limited. To Metallica and nasyid.

Which is why Second Combat was like a breath of fresh air, although much research was needed in order for me to understand what they were talking about during the interview.

Second Combat is probably one of the biggest local straight edge acts that actually have a following in Europe. But that is not important. What’s more important to you is the question – what in the world is straight edge?

Straight edge emerged as a reactionary sub culture in hard core punk. As punk was being painted with images of drug abuse, alcoholism and other questionable methods of self-expression, straight edge followers refrained from booze, cigarettes or any other questionable herbs that promote light-headedness. Some even go the extra mile by being vegan and not drinking coffee.

The two members of the four-member band who spoke to me were serious about what they preach. Both Ein (vocals) and Arwith (bass) have been staunch vegetarians for the past six years. Both, in their early 30s, are non-smokers. So what happens if someone breaks the rules, I asked. “They just fade away.” Ahh.. okay.

A quick search on YouTube before the interview left me curious as to what in the world they were singing about. Hardcore music is loud and fast. The message, if any, is sure to be lost along the way. I wonder whether their fans actually know what the band was playing, the words to the songs, and the points they were putting across.

Second Combat uses the fast paced hard music as a symbolism reflecting their anger. When asked what was the root of their current anger, it was clear that the band was highly political and wanted their voices heard.

“We sing about the environment, human trafficking, child labour, education system, indigenous rights, globalisation, capitalism. But the main issue is mostly drugs.” A concept alien to Justin Bieber fans, im sure.

The band’s shift from punk rock to straight edge developed from the period between 1996 and 2000. They saw how drugs and alcohol disintegrated their families and friends. Ein relates how he had nobody to look up to, while his teenage curiosity won over him. He now tours schools, organizing talks to get the kids to understand why they must never come close to substance abuse.

In their point of view, corruption is another major problem. “It goes all the way to the top. It must be changed” they say. According to them, corruption is the main gateway for drugs to reach the kids. The music they are presenting, though not so radio friendly, is getting a huge following from around the world; as far as the straight edge scene is concerned.

Having performed in gigs across Europe, they have seen how the youth on the other side of the globe are more exposed to a different pattern of thought.

Although I trust that my mother would classify Second Combat as a devil-worshipping band due to the level of noise, it is rather clear that this punk band deserves to be listened to. Or at least have their lyrics understood, before head-banging to the songs.

They talk about heavy political issues, including free education for the poor. “If Turkey can provide free education with limited resources, why can’t we?” they ask. “The current government is purely not performing. They are merely robbing us all.”

They were not afraid to say so on record. They say corruption is eating society like a virus. Artists like themselves are going all out to change the situation for the better. “Our art is for the people. Not for self-satisfaction.” – The Rocket

This article was written by on Wednesday, August 8, 2012 at 2:59 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →