Ronnie Liu : Taking it in stride

3 August, 2011

As the executive councillor (EXCO) with one of the most visible portfolios in Selangor, Ronnie Liu clocks a frenetic pace at his work. Media attention has been compounded by the almost ceaseless attacks from his detractors. But Ronnie knows it comes with the turf.

The fact that Selangor is run by opposition parties and the most advanced and prosperous state in Malaysia means that the stakes are higher here. A policy misquote or foul-up by any local council will instantly top the headlines of mainstream media looking to sully Pakatan’s reputation at every juncture. Yet Ronnie has taken it all in stride, sharpened by years of political battles with BN.

The Rocket had a long chat with Ronnie to hear his take on Selangor, the local councils and how he handles the controversies that surround him.


As a first term Exco of Selangor, how have you adapted to the role? How have the civil servants themselves accepted it?

Many of the civil servants, especially those who were UMNO members, were initially cautious toward me because of my past opposition toward the previous government. Many were wary if there would be any backlash and witch-hunts from me.

However, as part of the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) team, we were focused on ensuring a stable government. We set out to assure the local council mayors and council presidents (YDP) that they will be allowed to complete their tenure; we wanted continuance. Reforms were to be carried out later.

In any case, nine of the YDPs have left not because we terminated their contracts but for other reasons. This has helped to allay the fear of other civil servants.

As a state assemblyman (ADUN) yourself, how have you managed to handle the various local issues in your state seat?

As an ADUN, I had had to face continuous attacks from the local MCA chapter here, especially from Teh Kim Poh, the previous ADUN for Pandamaran. In order to keep up his relevance, many unsubstantiated allegations were levelled against me.

It was comical at times to hear the allegations. One day he would say that I have neglected to get the local council to tar the roads, just a day after they have done so. Another time it would be “Ronnie Liu didn’t hang Chinese New Year lightings for Pandamaran” even though the light bulbs would be dangling ominously outside his office. His outbursts and antics have kept me in the limelight, for better or for worse. But I took it in stride knowing I have done my duty for my constituents.

What is your daily routine like? What are the challenges that you face in your work?

The position of Exco in charge of local council affairs is a heavy responsibility. The local governance is naturally filled with issues and problems and it has kept me in the media attention. But I learnt to manage it. As a whole I trust the local councillors and YDPs to handle their issues; I don’t micro-manage them. I usually meet all of them once a month to be briefed of their problems and directions.

Additionally, I am also the state chairman of non-Muslim affairs. It is a hectic schedule on this end. As an indication, in my constituency alone I am normally invited to grace an average of three non-Muslim worship venue function events weekly. The portfolio requires me to handle many sensitive issues.

Then there are also many meet-the-people sessions which I have to attend almost daily. These sessions allow us to meet the sympathetic and neutral residents who may vote for us next time, and at times it is hard to say no.

My prominence in the media has also gained me some unrelated correspondence. Many unrelated queries come to me where I have to sort them out before passing it on to other Excos. It is quite time consuming.

With all the undue and biased press coverage of you, how have you deal with it? How do you handle the issues and many negative allegations that have being hurled at you?

It would seem that all problems in the world are linked to me (laughs)! Thank goodness, all the allegations hurled have not been proven at all. I have challenged all these accusers to provide proof and make reports with the police or MACC, yet none have been able to come forward with any concrete proof.

Since PR took over Selangor, no new cyber-cafes, gaming outlets and massage parlours have been approved in the state. Yet even the police and MACC have gotten into the fray by trying to link me with shady dealings, insinuating that there are illegal ones sprouting up under my stead. None has been proven thus far.

As my scope of work and power is very wide, I became an easy target for attack by my detractors. I have made many enemies in the past too, especially on the BN side. I was formerly the national publicity secretary for DAP, and it was my job to attack them. Perhaps I was a little more vocal than the rest; I even published a book titled “MCA’s Role in the Chinese Community: Culprit? Accomplice? Coward?” that zeroed in on MCA leaders’ malfeasance.

Today, I am still as vocal in defending my colleagues in government and DAP. I have ruffled a few feathers along the years with my attacks. However, I have no personal feelings regarding these verbal cross fires and the opponents. My only defence to beat these allegations is to make sure I am clean, upright and perform my duties as I should.

At this juncture how would you rate PR’s performance in governing the state?

The Selangor state government engages an independent pollster every three months to gauge our popularity level with the people. Thus far we have consistently averaged 60 percent ratings since we took over Selangor. I believe we are on the right track.

Can you describe some of the initiatives by the state government in helping the people?

Our efforts at making the economy people-centric have seen us spent close to RM 300 million the last three years. In addition to the free water for all Selangor residents, we have provided allocations for vernacular and religious schools and pocket money for the incoming tertiary students even though education is not the responsibility of the state government. We have also launched a micro credit loan program for the people to assist them in their business ventures, of which RM 50 million is for urban residents and RM 20 million for rural residents.

Additionally, PR has also given out 137 plots of land for non-Muslim worship places, which is more than what the previous BN government provided in the last 50 years. For the schools, RM 4 million have been given to Chinese vernacular schools, RM 6 million for religious schools and RM 4 million for Tamil vernacular schools. The combined total of this aid has exceeded RM 300 million.

Yet in the last three years, the state government’s cash reserve has almost doubled from the 2008 figure of around RM 400 million to RM 832 million as of April this year. When we took over in 2008, the cash reserve was placed in very low interest yielding deposits. We immediately switched it to higher yielding deposits; the increase in the interest was enough to pay all the Excos’ salaries for the next several years.

With all these cash reserves that are accumulating we will sow it back to the people. We have and will continue to support people-centric programs.

What are the issues and problems the state government faces? How is the state government solving them?

One of the areas where we are lacking in is publicity for our efforts. It doesn’t help that the mainstream media often blots out our achievements. Our information dissemination efforts need to be stepped up.

Our current outreach efforts via Selangor Kini, Selangor Times and TV Selangor are still limited. We need to increase the printing and distribution networks of these publications. The rural areas, especially the Malay areas need to be reached more effectively.

The performance of local councils is a crucial one for the state government as it is also the most visible for the people. What are some of the reforms that have taken place thus far?

In the area of cleanliness, the PR administration has set clear guidelines for the local councils to follow and we expect them to adhere to it. In addition, we have created the implementation of a “Clean Zone” in every local council. The intention is to transform dirty-prone places into clean and hygienic places.

There have been many issues and much news coverage regarding the allowable number of tables to be placed adjacent to an eatery’s premise. Generally there are guidelines which the restaurateur has to adhere to and proposals to be submitted before the local councils can approve them. However the local councils must also be prompt in deciding if the proposals are acceptable.

Now non-performing contractors will be monitored. If they fail to adhere to the contract requirements, they will be blacklisted from performing jobs for all other Selangor local councils for two years. We will track this via our state-linked database that is accessible via a web portal know as UPEN.

Can you relate about the financial performance of the local councils?

The total income of all the local councils for 2010 totalled around RM 1.4 billion, which is close to the total income received by the state government at around RM 1.5 billion. All the local councils’ financial performances have improved since we took over. There is a concerted effort to improve revenue collection and spend prudently throughout all local councils.

For example open tender is now a requirement for all contracts worth more than RM 20,000, while for those contracts below the amount we required three quotations for them. We are seeing results for such efforts. Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) and Klang Municipal Council (MPK) are two of the outstanding examples. MBPJ’s cash reserves improved from RM 80 million to RM 172 million in 2010 while MPK recorded RM 10 million surplus from a deficit of RM 10 million in 2008.

As mentioned before, we want the local councils to spend the cash accumulated for the people’s wellbeing. MBPJ is now embarking on building more car parks for congested areas near places of worships. Resident associations in PJ have received allocations of RM 5,000 from MBPJ to fund their gated and guarded community self-patrol programs.

The local councils will share their burden with each other, with the richer ones helping the poorer ones. The four financially endowed local councils will provide RM 1 million each in cash or in kind to help the other poorer councils.

After three years in partnership and in government with the other PR parties, how would you rate DAP’s relationship with other PR parties? What are the positives and challenges in working with other PR parties?

At the leadership level, PR parties are bonding well. There is a better understanding now of each party’s stand and concerns. At the grassroots level, the parties are having more joint activities now. Selangor DAP has been working with other PR parties since before 2008. This was more so for us in the Klang area.

However there are some challenges as well. Some of our more conservative PR members are not comfortable with some administrative policies such as liberalising cyber-cafes and holding concerts which they deem rowdy.

We understand where their concerns are, but some of the more liberal and vocal constituents are not happy with this creeping conservatism either. As a compromise, we advise our local councils to enforce restrictions in terms of appropriate attire for concert performers so as not to hurt any religious sensitivities. It does put us in a delicate and sensitive position at times.

What are the areas that PR need to improve on? What needs to be done to attract people to PR’s cause?

We have to be careful in handling our differences. No PR leaders should be making any unilateral declaration openly in the media without consulting each other beforehand. We need to learn to respect each other’s cultures and sensitivities.

Another matter concerns the joint activities. We have to learn to do things together. All PR events organisers have to make a conscious effort in inclusivity. As an example, for DAP’s ceramah cum dinner events, we have to ensure suitable food is served and appropriate number of tables allocated for PKR and PAS members.

Likewise for PAS; whenever they organise public ceramahs, DAP speakers should also be invited. While on the issue of ceramahs, we have to be multi-lingual in our presentation. This is especially true for non-Malay speakers that mostly come from DAP and PKR.

What does DAP need to do to improve on to maintain its appeal to all?

DAP is getting weaker in the area of disseminating information via the traditional methods such as holding ceramahs or public forums. In Selangor we have slacked in this area. Relating to this is the need for the party leadership to continuously visit and get in touch with the grassroots members

In our efforts to reach out to non-Chinese members, we should levy on the bond of our cooperation with PKR and PAS. It is good that we are striving to form more Malay-majority branches; however we would be more effective if our local branches hold events jointly with other PR parties’ branches to reach out to the Malays.

Admittedly, our reputation in the Malay community has been sullied for so long by the UMNO-controlled media. It is an uphill struggle for us to repair the damage due to limited or unfair media coverage. One way to break this is to always be consciously appearing with other PR party leaders to show camaraderie in our fight for a common cause. It provides a platform for us to reach the Malays. I can attest to its effectiveness as I have been doing this for almost 20 years.

In this light, I have to admit that it was a little disappointing that many DAP leaders were not present to give support to Anwar in his sodomy trial verdict hearing.

For the Indian community, we have to understand the issues that are dear to them. Spiritual matters are important to them. The neglect and tearing down of Hindu temples by the BN administration issue was one of the catalyst for the Indian community’s epic shift in support for the opposition.

In the Hindraf protests, I made a conscious effort to be present there with the protesters. I also donate regularly to Hindu temple fundraisings in my constituency from my ADUN allocations. Some of the Hindu temple management staffs are surprised at my generous donations to them. It leaves a lasting impression on them. -The Rocket

This article was written by on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at 3:39 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. Tags:

Comments are closed.

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →