Prising the Fortress – Johor

13 July, 2012

Johor’s distinction as the stronghold for BN is about to end. The galore of issues swamping the southern state has Barisan Nasional (BN) quaking in its boots. The Rocket’s T.K Tan looked at some of the issues with Johor DAP chairman Dr Boo Cheng Hau, state deputy chairman Norman Fernandez, Bakri MP ER Teck Hwa and PAS national vice president Salahuddin Ayob and pondered the imminent: Can Pakatan Rakyat capitalise on it?
BN Betrayed The People’s Trust

Touted as the crown jewel of southern Malaysia, Iskandar Malaysia (IM) was the highlight of the Tun Abdullah Badawi administration in his failed economic corridors rejuvenation effort.

Post March 2008, in BN’s attempt to starve off the economic lifelines of the PR-run states of Penang and Selangor, more fiscal and administrative efforts were made to prop up IM while dishing out more contracts for its cronies. However the efforts have been unimpressive.

From 2006 to first quarter of 2012, IM only secured realised investments of RM 37.75 billion despite rigorous promotional efforts and generous tax incentives. A big chunk of this amount is in property investments (Star BizWeek, 26 May 2012).

In comparison, from 2008 to 2011 Selangor and Penang respectively registered RM 38 billion and RM 33.67 billion in manufacturing investments alone with no added specific tax incentives.

The Iskandar Regional Development (IRDA) forecasts that IM needs RM 383 billion worth of investments in order to succeed. Since 2006, less than RM 35 billion of foreign direct investment (FDI) has come in.

Johor DAP state chairman and Skudai ADUN Dr Boo Cheng Hau points out that with the way BN is running the government, many investors are sceptical of Malaysia’s administrative transparency and honesty.

“Arlida Ariff, the former chief executive officer (CEO) of Iskandar Investment Berhad (IIB), the investment company in charge of developing IM, was removed for allegedly awarding infrastructure contracts to her relatives. There has not been any action by MACC or the police on this case yet,” Boo began.

According to the Sun, some of these allegations also include infrastructure projects being awarded to other IIB senior executives’ relatives.

“Even Johor BN-connected businessmen are unhappy with the way the projects have been given out. The bulk of the projects have been given to the BN federal government cronies. As for the foreign investors who are coming in, they are snapping up properties but not developing it,” he narrated.

Another issue is that of the bureaucratic hurdles in terms of licensing and local council service delivery, which also increases the propensity for corruption. The unclear separation of power for the various authorities in making decision doesn’t help either.

“If we don’t change our way of management in the government, it will be hard to retain the investors’ confidence in Malaysia. The foreign investors are sitting on the side for a change of government before committing to develop their investments.”

Flip-flopping labour policy

One of the perennial banes for businesses is the government’s flip-flopping policy on hiring policy of migrant workers. “We need to regularly study and estimate the number of workers needed for labour force requirements in order to regulate them,” he remarked.

“We can’t give lop-sided treatment to the businesses in freeing our migrant labour policies without taking into account the local’s social and economic wellbeing.” Indeed, a stable labour policy to facilitate the economic growth while giving the locals’ economic chances is long overdue.

He adds that Johor has a disproportionately high number of foreign migrant workers in Malaysia. “Around 15 percent of the state population are foreigners; at the same time many of our skilled workers are working in Singapore. This medley of contradictions is an issue that will cause long-term social and economic problems for Johor,” he said.

Inept Management

Moving on, Boo touches on the state’s dismal finances. Perusing through some of the numbers reveals the extent of BN’s fiduciary negligence.

“Johor Corporation Bhd (JCorp), the state government’s main investment arm, has been saddled with huge debt from it earlier aggressive and cavalier buying spree in the early 2000s. It has RM 3.2 billion debt due by 2013 and more than RM 6 billion in debt,” he detailed.

To improve its cash flow, it is restructuring its main investments in KFC Holdings Bhd (KFCH). KFCH is 50.6 percent owned by QSR Bhd, which in turn is 57.5 percent owned by Kulim Bhd, which is 53 percent owned by JCorp. (The Star, 4 December 2010).

To bring KFCH closer to JCorp, JCorp will potentially incur around RM 5.2 billion more debt to acquire KFCH. (The Edge, 21 May 2012).

“In many of the GLCs’ strategic transactions, there is a lack of transparency in its dealings. Questionable decisions and management is causing the state and its people to lose out substantially,” he remarked.

Another state GLC, Kumpulan Prasarana Rakyat Johor (KPRJ) sold its prized investments in Tebrau Teguh Bhd (TTB) without open tender to a private entity. TTB owns a RM 15 billion refinery and choice land banks in the Tebrau area which can be developed by the new private TTB owners for a lucrative sum. (The Edge, 31 January 2012).

“The state government-linked corporations (GLCs) are not showing transparency in awarding contracts. This is tarnishing the government’s image badly,” he said.

Prudence is not one of the state government’s virtues, it seems. “In 2008, Yayasan Pelajaran Johor (YPJ) could not account for its RM 73 million investments because RM 14 million of its subsidiary investments was not accounted for.”

“The Johor BN government needs to come clean and reform its ways in running the state GLCs. Some of the BN leaders may want to clean up its corrupted ways, but they fear political backlash if too much of the cobwebs are exposed for public scrutiny. The cronies are not willing to let go of the old ways; too much is at stake,” he points out.

Not Just the GLCs

Even the state government’s finances are in shambles. “Its debt currently stands at RM 1.38 billion, with almost RM 700 million carried over from Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s days as Menteri Besar in Johor. The bulk of that amount was incurred for water processing infrastructure,” Boo explained.

During the early 2000s Syarikat Air Johor (SAJ) -the GLC responsible for managing water resources for Johor- managed to reduce non-revenue water rate from 49 percent to 29 percent.

At the same time, water tariff for Johor has increased several times. “Now it’s almost three times that of Penang and one of the highest in the country. One wonders why Johor can’t pay off its water-related debt with such good revenue conditions,” he sneered.

“Now SAJ has been surrendered to the federal government’s water supply agency, Pengurusan Asset Air Bhd (PAAB). Water resources management is one of the few remaining areas where a state government has sovereignty in this federation where the federal government is increasingly powerful. This is tantamount to betraying the people’s trust,” Boo complained.

The state government’s poor management of cash is another glaring example. As a comparison, from March 2008 to 2010 Selangor’s cash reserve increased from around RM 400 million to RM 918 million in 2010.

From 2007 to 2010, Johor’s cash reserves dropped from RM 100 million to RM 38 million. “Where’s the accountability?”

“The state government’s arrogance has even affected the legislative arm. The state assembly had the audacity to conduct its state Standing Order Committee and Privileges Committee meetings in Kuala Terengganu in April. This is clearly against commonwealth parliamentary practice,” he said.

“The state speaker snubbed my query by saying it’s his prerogative to hold it where he deems fit. What is the motive of holding the state legislative meetings in another state? Are we a government in exile?”

Burning the People

A sign of a heartless government is unfair taxation; for Johor Bahru folks, the ridiculous toll rates are hitting the people’s pockets hard.

“Each day hundreds of thousands of Malaysians cross the Causeway to travel to and from Singapore for work, studies and shopping. An overwhelming majority of them pass through the Iskandar Customs, Immigration and Quarantine Complex (CIQ).”

“PLUS has been collecting toll on the Iskandar CIQ since the 1990s; it is estimated that between RM 876 million and RM 1.32 billion has been collected by PLUS without it having to build any highways extending from the Iskandar CIQ,” Boo explained.

“The toll is supposedly collected for the maintenance of the Causeway, which was built by the British in 1923. Now after building the Eastern Dispersal Link (EDL), PLUS is to levy toll on users who leave the CIQ and uses the EDL to travel to other parts of Johor Bahru.”

The initial proposed toll was RM 6.20 one way, averaging 76 sen per kilometre which is exorbitantly higher than DUKE, AKLEH or PLUS highways. As a result of public pressure and protests, the toll collection has been deferred until after the general elections (GE).

“Many of those who travel to and work in Singapore are wage earners already suffering from the Singapore economic downturn and its higher labour levy. This toll collection will affect their income substantially,” he bemoaned. – the Rocket.

This article was written by on Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:05 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →