Penang, Here and Now

29 June, 2012

Earning its maverick label, Penang voters have dared to go against the political tide even before the 2008 political tsunami. Will Penangites’ fiercely independent streak favor Pakatan Rakyat once again in GE13? Penang State EXCO for Religious Affairs, Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Abdul Malik Kassim shares his formula and wishlist with Izmil Amri .

 

 

Abdul Malik Abdul Kassim, 58, is the State Assemblyman for Batu Maung. He is also the state EXCO for Religious Affairs, Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs. He is the PKR Nibong Tebal Chairman, PKR Tanjung division chief and state liaison committee secretary.

 

 

The Rocket: What is your prediction for GE13?

Abdul Malik: God willing, we are confident to keep the 29 of seats that we (PR) have. If we get lucky we may even increase the number of seats. There is always potential to improve.

The mood of the people is clear. We have a large number of hardcore supporters. These are not necessarily party members but they support the PR government.

What’s more important are the fence-sitters. BN is also targeting them. But we believe it is difficult for the BN to win them over using their recent political style of persecution and hatred. People are getting bored of it. So this is an advantage to us (PR).

The Rocket: So retaining Penang is pretty much in the bag for PR?

Abdul Malik: We do not have the motto of “dulu kini dan selamanya”. For us (PR), today is the beginning and the end. We live in the moment. We are not sure whether or not tomorrow will be on our side. So we are well prepared and work hard all the time.

We have not stopped worked after the last General Election. Technical aspects, such as training of PACA (polling agents, counting agents) are always attended to. Our spirit and determination remains steadfast. There is no guarantee for us tomorrow if there is no effort today.

The Rocket: Despite various efforts, PR still gets flak about Malays being “left behind”… Is PR being defamed and maligned?

Abdul Malik: For me it is simple. We have to look at political elements in Penang. Practically speaking, if Penang has 90 per cent Chinese and 10 per cent Malays, maybe it is easy for Lim Guan Eng to ignore the Malay minority.

But the reality is not so. Penang Malays make up more than 40 percent of the population. PR or DAP’s political survival depends on the Malay support. Guan Eng will not be stupid enough to ignore the Malays. It is not logical, it doesn’t make sense… because the facts are clear. If that happens, both Guan Eng and DAP will be finished.

I rely on this element. In my constituency Batu Maung, the (racial) ratio is about 50-50, I must take care of all races. I am a PKR representative. Similarly, Guan Eng as DAP elected representative has to take care of all races.

DAP’s future depends on the party’s own policies. DAP is a multi-racial party and it should be seen as multi-racial party. If I can see this political reality, it is impossible for Guan Eng to not see it.

The Rocket: How will electoral fraud impact PR?

Abdul Malik: We have to face the facts. In order for BN to maintain power, they will not meet Bersih’s demands for free and fair elections. We cannot hope for UMNO-BN to change because they know if they do, that is the end of their story.

So we’ll continue to fight. We must win in the next election in order to fix this (electoral fraud). We want this victory so that we can bring change.

The Rocket: Why should people choose PR?

Abdul Malik: There is a very simple reason. The UMNO-BN coalition has become stubborn. They regard bribes and corruption as their flesh and blood. Without corruption, UMNO will not be able to survive. Meanwhile, the nation pays the price for these corrupt political practices.

PR has shown that it can curb corruption… particularly in Penang and Selangor you can see how the people have profited. This is the most important reason why we need to vote for PR.

In addition if we (PR) can win the general election, and UMNO-BN loses, we can indirectly create a two-party system. This is good for people, unlike a single ruling party.

We do not even want to be preoccupied with power. Without a two party system, any party that wins will be too powerful and eventually it will turn into a corrupt government.

All this will be history if BN is defeated in GE 13. There will be a new era… the birth of a new dimension of politics. Check and balance is a very effective system.

PR wants to introduce many new policies. For example, I want to suggest that we limit the term of office for the Prime Minister to a maximum of two or three terms. This will help change (the system) for a better and more transparent Malaysia.

The Rocket: How about PR’s ability to lead Penang?

Abdul Malik: I was born and bred in Penang and have been observing the political scene since the late 1970s. PR is a strong combination and we hope it is sustainable. We are sticking together not only to gain ruling power. Our parties share the same basic principles especially competency, accountability, and transparency. In the past 4 years, our track record has proven that we are able to govern well. -The Rocket

Penang's Top 10 Successes

This article was written by on Friday, June 29, 2012 at 4:50 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →