National Harmony Act, Another Sham?

30 July, 2012

by Lim Guan Eng

DAP welcomes the repeal of the Sedition Act 1948, the draconian and antiquated piece of legislation that has over half a century been used and abused to suppress legitimate political opposition. However, we also urge the government to ensure that its replacement, the National Harmony Act, will not end up like the newly-introduced Peaceful Assembly Act which has turned out to be nothing but a sham.

The Peaceful Assembly Act, which was introduced last year, has introduced a multitude of arbitrary requirements, making it even more difficult for people to assemble, and incredibly even outlaws street protests. Worse, the act has now been used to selectively prosecute opposition leaders including Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over the Bersih 3.0 protest in Dataran Merdeka earlier this year.

The only way to prove the government’s sincerity in introducing the National Harmony Act is by immediately withdrawing all existing charges under the Sedition Act against DAP Chairman Karpal Singh and other leaders.

I myself have been a victim of the Sedition Act. In 1998, I was convicted and imprisoned for 18 months for allegedly making seditious remarks that caused public disaffection over my defence of an under-aged Malay girl who was detained despite being a rape victim.

Here, it is very clear that like the now-repealed ISA, the Sedition Act has long been used as a convenient political tool against members of the opposition including myself, other MPs, journalists and even NGO leaders.

Datuk Seri Najib Razak himself recently admitted that the ISA was a political tool that has in the past been used for “wrongful reasons”.

If that is the case, then Najib should now prove his sincerity and commitment to reform by not only withdrawing all existing charges against Karpal Singh and other leaders but also issuing an official apology to all those convicted throughout the years under both under the Sedition Act as well as the ISA. – The Rocket

This article was written by on Monday, July 30, 2012 at 3:17 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

GE13: Vote for Party or Person? by Steven Sim

26 April, 2013 1 Comment

Some candidates, in particular from Barisan Nasional (BN), Malaysia’s ruling coalition for the last half a century, have been going around saying, “We should vote for the party, not the persons”. Their sentiment is understandable. For the first time in 55 years, BN faces the possibility of defeat in a ... Full Article →

Undaunted by stiff battle, Wong Tack pushes on

4 April, 2013 1 Comment

By Chung Hosanna It’s 11.30 and the sun is merciless in Bentong’s one street morning market. A man walks up to Wong Tack, clad in the same signature green shirt as him, a familiar colour that has come to symbolise the Himpunan Hijau cause. “You are my idol. I will ... Full Article →

Another victim of electoral fraud

16 January, 2013 0 Comments

KARAK – A resident in the state assembly seat of Sabai, Pahang has become yet another victim of electorate manipulation, one of the many forms of electoral fraud done by moving electorates to constituencies not of their own. The resident, only known as Chong, has complained that two of his ... Full Article →

Keep Calm and vote Pakatan Rakyat

15 March, 2013 1 Comment

Don’t believe the scare-mongering and fear tactics, Malaysia is perfectly capable of a peaceful transition of government should Pakatan Rakyat win the 13th General Election. Here are seven reasons why: 1.     A change of ruling government is a normal procedure which will be conducted peacefully. DAP Election Strategist Ong Kian ... Full Article →