“Dont listen to your Vice Chancellor”

30 July, 2012

by Chung Hosanna

After 25 years of lecturing, Professor Dr Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi has come to the conclusion that our public universities have failed. The University Technology Malaysia (UTM) architecture lecturer passionately defends his views about the lost mission of universities.

“Our universities have totally failed to develop humanity. We can create people to work in offices, but we have failed to develop the larger potential of a person who can contribute to the community, the country and the world,” says the seasoned academician.

Tajuddin calls out the current ‘trade mindset’ prevailing in public universities which, he says, are churning out students like products.

Despite achieving 100% employment rate, these graduates go on to do the work of production workers and not ‘ideas people’. Their design, ideas and creativity skills are different from an overseas graduate.

“Not that ideas people are more important than production workers… but a production worker is at the level of diploma. If you want to just produce engineers and architects, you can have a technical school to train them by repetition,” he says.

The objective to emphasize on a student’s career instead of human development is reflected in the restrictive curriculum of public universities where 80% is devoted to course subjects and only 20% for human development. When career is over emphasised, the wholesome development of the Person is left out.

“Perhaps there’s a misunderstanding about our role to build a ‘world class university’ instead of a ‘civilised society’.  We are in trouble if (the former) is what if we’re after,” Tajuddin says this is a handicap to the development of various disciplines.

Rankings cannot measure contribution

The Penang-born architect expresses surprise at the public furore over the drop in Malaysian universities place in international rankings. He points out that such rankings cannot correctly reflect whether the university is producing students that are able to contribute to society.

Public universities are heavily subsidised by the government and in that sense are less driven by the bottom line. Universities are either driven to contribute to society or for commercial interest- these are the only two choices. Hence, public universities should place contribution to society as its foremost goal.

“I would measure lecturers and students by their direct contribution to society. Where are your papers published? How many books have you written to educate the people?” Tajuddin has written many books, journal articles, and papers on cultural and value based design ideas in the realm of community architecture.

“It boggles my mind to think that we chase after rankings to attract foreigners to our university; when our primary duty is towards our local graduates. This is very strange. Do we want to serve the local community or attract the international community? It’s a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul.”

Tajuddin thinks Malaysian universities are ‘jumping the gun’ by trying to achieve international recognition without having first done its part to inspire and educate the local community.

If Ivy League universities are the benchmark, Tajuddin questions whether local universities would follow in Harvard’s footsteps to allow its lecturers to speak out freely in public about all issues under the sun.

Don’t listen to your Vice Chancellor

Many local lecturers are prohibited from expressing controversial or anti-establishment views, case in point being constitutional law expert Professor Aziz Bari of the International Islamic University who was suspended for expressing his views on a decree by the Sultan of Selangor on the 2011 JAIS church raid.

Saddened by Aziz Bari’s suspension, Tajuddin wrote an article about what he terms the ‘loss of academic license’ among Malaysian academia.

A profound silence of academician’s views exists in our local public space. In the case of the Lynas (Kuantan rare earth plant), none of the environmental professors had publicly expressed their expert views. Neither was there any response by knowledgeable academicians on the purported Anwar sex videos.

This absence is only partly attributed to the so-called culture of fear that has been instilled and reinforced over the years.

Quite apart from being deterred by the fear syndrome, Tajuddin says many academicians are unaware of their social responsibility to use the knowledge they have gained to educate the larger public. They think their job is only to teach students how to pass exams.

Tajuddin relates a story of how a friend once advised him to ‘play the game’ in order to be promoted. However, he refused, preferring to listen to his conscience. Eventually, Tajuddin was promoted ahead of his friend. “The next book I want to write is called ‘Don’t Listen to the Vice Chancellor’,” he quips.

According to the New Zealand Public University Audit Report, universities that restrict or fail to encourage its lecturers to engage in public discourse can lose their licenses. This is a far cry from the local KPI-centric administrators’ practice of stifling and prodding lecturers.

“Creativity is… letting them mess around”

Mollycoddled lecturers will in turn produce students who are timid intellectually as well as in life. Tajuddin warns that creativity cannot thrive in a restrictive environment.

While many universities claim to emphasise on creativity, they do not understand that the creative process involves a larger realisation of the meaning of life, says Tajuddin. Administrators and academics must know the importance of encouraging this.

“Let a student mess around, he will become creative. If you try to control him with a lot of donts, it wont work,” says Tajuddin, who was formerly the Director of KALAM (Center for the Study of Built Environment in the Malay World).

Although an expert on Islamic architecture, Tajuddin has spoken out against the ‘Malay-isation of Malaysian architecture’, he criticises the lack of balanced representation of other cultures in our national architecture.

He notes that in discussing this topic, many students dare not voice out their controversial views during classes, they choose to express their views about racism in architecture in their assignments.

“I asked the students in private, whether they were afraid of the Malay students (gangsters)? Being marked by the university as a radical? I think a certain culture of fear exists. I tell them that they are free to speak anything in my class, I can accept criticism… but they dare not.”

Students treated like ‘pariahs’

Many students who dare not speak out have low self esteem bred from the mentality of being treated disrespectfully, says Tajuddin.

He relates incidents where many support staff in universities treat students rudely, “like slaves and pariahs”. How can students rise up as the future generation of leaders if they are treated in this manner?

The 50-year-old lecturer also told The Rocket that the “militaristic stance” of the guards in universities and the presence of imposing gateways make the university seem like a boarding school.

He questioned the rationale of preventing outsiders from entering the university. Instead, he suggested that universities make available night classes for the community. A multi-functional university environment can unleash freedom of knowledge.

Tajuddin drew a comparison with Indonesian universities, which grant wide autonomy to its students. On the campus of Universitas Indonesia, students prepare lectures and have power to govern their own affairs. There is no such thing as Deputy Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs, or a Student Affairs Department.

As a result, students are directly responsible to the next generation of students. They run community programs, mini lectures for the (paying) public, and generate income through tuition for other students. With such strong student representation, even the government fears the students.

In contrast, Tajuddin says he has never seen strong student election spirit in local public universities. In UTM, the Faculty of the Built Environment even had to hold a lucky draw to encourage students to come out to vote!

Many students do not believe in the idea of student representation, because they have not met their student reps or seen them conduct activities in faculties. Tajuddin decries the lack of “mature political activity” among public university students.

Beyond 4.0 students

So what should we learn in our universities? What should be the foundation of our education system?

From our discussion with Tajuddin, he emphasizes on respect for fellow humans, love for all civilization, and a keen sense of awareness that knowledge permeates the great universe.

Economic concerns are not even close to being enough. We have to move beyond the ‘live to eat’ mindset of subsistence if we want to groom students who are entrepreneurial and creative.

Tajuddin tells us that a successful student is not just one with a 4.0 academic average. He attributes his success in architecture as being inspired by his understanding of Islam and relationship with life.

“This is what I advise parents who want their child to be a doctor, lawyer, accountant, high achiever. You don’t just want them to be an engineer… but someone who knows his responsibilities as a human… a good person.”

We couldn’t agree more. –The Rocket

Ed: We have since corrected a factual error regarding Dr Tajuddin’s position in KALAM. Thank you for pointing that out.

This article was written by on Monday, July 30, 2012 at 4:03 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


  • Correction: he was the director of KALAM. Someone else is the director of KALAM right now since 2008. Please check your information again.

  • prof tajuddin is the best in the university. i hope the best for him as my dear mentor and his dear wife. of course his international views can change these current situations to higher level.

Leave a Reply

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →