Coming To Terms With Singapore

13 July, 2012

by TK Tan

Johor’s love and hate relationship with Singapore is well known, with Johor mostly doing the disparaging. However, economic reality weighs heavily in Singapore’s favour.

Norman Fernandez, Johor DAP deputy chairman, points out that JB’s prosperity is dependent on Singapore. According to the World Bank’s ‘Malaysia Economic Monitor 2011 Report – Brain Drain’, up to 176,000 people are estimated to travel to and from Singapore daily for work and studies. Most of them stay in Johor Bahru (JB).

“A big amount of FDIs in JB comes from Singapore. However, Singaporean investors are now spoilt for choice in the region in terms of better and cheaper investing destinations. In addition, Singapore is also Malaysia’s biggest source of tourist arrivals, the majority of them passing through JB.” he said.

“As long as economic lure is on the Singapore side, many Malaysians will choose to work there, whether they stay there long-term or commute daily from JB. JB has an important role to play in the two countries’ economic ties.”

A constant gripe for JB folks is the poor transportation linkage with Singapore. There is no seamless travel and efficient public transport to ferry people from JB’s surrounding area to the customs checkpoints, unlike in Singapore where public transportation system is efficient.

“Many Malaysians are forced to drive their own vehicles into Singapore,” he remarked.

“We need to revamp JB’s transportation system. The joint development of the MRT system connecting Singapore and JB is long overdue. However Johor state government’s poor urban planning is handicapping that ideal.”

Bad planning

JB, particularly its downtown commercial centre, has also become a victim of poor infrastructural thinking and planning.

According to the Malaysian Insider (24 January 2012), local businesses in JB have been hit by the shift in Singapore tourists after the new Custom, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) complex and a direct route to the North-South Expressway from the Second Link in Tuas were built in 2008 and 2007 respectively.

The Causeway’s share as an entry point for tourist arrivals dropped from 82 per cent in 2007 to 64 per cent in 2008 while the Second Link’s share shot to 29 per cent.

“Today many Singaporeans can drive through the Second Link and head for Melaka and other places bypassing JB altogether. JB has tired features that don’t attract the Singaporean tourists anymore,” he opined.

“JB is like a cowboy town, where the Singaporean visitors come for a day trip and not much else. The new attraction spots such as Legoland in Nusajaya may stir some interest, but we need to transform our appeal in the long haul.”

“We need to repackage JB as a wholesome family attraction, much like what Golden Sands and Marina Bay has done for Singapore,” he elaborated.

Rethinking The Approach

The antagonistic posture adopted by both countries in their bilateral ties, especially in regards to the Causeway and other issues has not helped to facilitate economic ties. In the past Malaysia has been sabre-rattling about removing the Causeway and cutting water supply to Singapore.

“In dealing with Singapore, we have to work on a win-win mentality. Crying that we need to protect our sovereignty is good; we need to acknowledge that Singapore also needs assurance from Malaysia in some areas,” Fernandez opined.

“Singapore needs water and sand from us and we want a fair price for them; put in place a proper pricing mechanism to execute it. Malaysia on the other hand needs smoother Causeway linkage. Let’s work on that.”

“Singapore will gladly reduce traffic on the Causeway if we can build the MRT and ferry JB commuters seamlessly to and from Singapore as the Lion City is also getting more congested by the day,” he elaborated.

“We need to sit down, rethink the priorities and see each other as partners and not competitors in order to progress.”

“Definitely Singapore will drive a hard bargain. Malaysia however, can accommodate in some areas in fostering our economic ties with them.”

“Having a take-it-or-leave-it attitude is not conducive for progress. Regardless of what happens now, it is the people who is being held hostage by the politicians’ antics,” he said. –The Rocket

This article was written by on Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:23 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →