Coming To Terms With Singapore

13 July, 2012

by TK Tan

Johor’s love and hate relationship with Singapore is well known, with Johor mostly doing the disparaging. However, economic reality weighs heavily in Singapore’s favour.

Norman Fernandez, Johor DAP deputy chairman, points out that JB’s prosperity is dependent on Singapore. According to the World Bank’s ‘Malaysia Economic Monitor 2011 Report – Brain Drain’, up to 176,000 people are estimated to travel to and from Singapore daily for work and studies. Most of them stay in Johor Bahru (JB).

“A big amount of FDIs in JB comes from Singapore. However, Singaporean investors are now spoilt for choice in the region in terms of better and cheaper investing destinations. In addition, Singapore is also Malaysia’s biggest source of tourist arrivals, the majority of them passing through JB.” he said.

“As long as economic lure is on the Singapore side, many Malaysians will choose to work there, whether they stay there long-term or commute daily from JB. JB has an important role to play in the two countries’ economic ties.”

A constant gripe for JB folks is the poor transportation linkage with Singapore. There is no seamless travel and efficient public transport to ferry people from JB’s surrounding area to the customs checkpoints, unlike in Singapore where public transportation system is efficient.

“Many Malaysians are forced to drive their own vehicles into Singapore,” he remarked.

“We need to revamp JB’s transportation system. The joint development of the MRT system connecting Singapore and JB is long overdue. However Johor state government’s poor urban planning is handicapping that ideal.”

Bad planning

JB, particularly its downtown commercial centre, has also become a victim of poor infrastructural thinking and planning.

According to the Malaysian Insider (24 January 2012), local businesses in JB have been hit by the shift in Singapore tourists after the new Custom, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) complex and a direct route to the North-South Expressway from the Second Link in Tuas were built in 2008 and 2007 respectively.

The Causeway’s share as an entry point for tourist arrivals dropped from 82 per cent in 2007 to 64 per cent in 2008 while the Second Link’s share shot to 29 per cent.

“Today many Singaporeans can drive through the Second Link and head for Melaka and other places bypassing JB altogether. JB has tired features that don’t attract the Singaporean tourists anymore,” he opined.

“JB is like a cowboy town, where the Singaporean visitors come for a day trip and not much else. The new attraction spots such as Legoland in Nusajaya may stir some interest, but we need to transform our appeal in the long haul.”

“We need to repackage JB as a wholesome family attraction, much like what Golden Sands and Marina Bay has done for Singapore,” he elaborated.

Rethinking The Approach

The antagonistic posture adopted by both countries in their bilateral ties, especially in regards to the Causeway and other issues has not helped to facilitate economic ties. In the past Malaysia has been sabre-rattling about removing the Causeway and cutting water supply to Singapore.

“In dealing with Singapore, we have to work on a win-win mentality. Crying that we need to protect our sovereignty is good; we need to acknowledge that Singapore also needs assurance from Malaysia in some areas,” Fernandez opined.

“Singapore needs water and sand from us and we want a fair price for them; put in place a proper pricing mechanism to execute it. Malaysia on the other hand needs smoother Causeway linkage. Let’s work on that.”

“Singapore will gladly reduce traffic on the Causeway if we can build the MRT and ferry JB commuters seamlessly to and from Singapore as the Lion City is also getting more congested by the day,” he elaborated.

“We need to sit down, rethink the priorities and see each other as partners and not competitors in order to progress.”

“Definitely Singapore will drive a hard bargain. Malaysia however, can accommodate in some areas in fostering our economic ties with them.”

“Having a take-it-or-leave-it attitude is not conducive for progress. Regardless of what happens now, it is the people who is being held hostage by the politicians’ antics,” he said. –The Rocket

This article was written by on Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:23 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Other News

Why couldn’t the National Sports Institute afford a specialist for Lee Chong Wei?

10 November, 2014 0 Comments

By Chong Zhemin, DAP Perak Economic Development Bureau Chief The whole nation is shocked following news that world number one shutter Lee Chong Wei failed his B sample urine test. Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin explained during the press conference that Dexamethasone, traces of which were found in Lee Chong Wei’s ... Full Article →

Pakatan primes for the next level

23 September, 2014 0 Comments

The near miss to bring about political change in the last general elections have left many wondering if BN’s five-decades stranglehold on the political powers of Malaysia will ever be broken. As a continuation of this series of interviews of PR leaders on its future, PKR’s deputy president Azmin Ali ... Full Article →

Penang launches campaign to combat violence against women

19 November, 2014 0 Comments

The Penang State Government has launched a historic three-week state-wide campaign against Violence Against Women (VAW) to raise awareness about preventing violence against women and girls. This is the first state-sponsored event of its kind organised by the Penang State Executive Council for Women, Family and Community Development, and the Penang ... Full Article →

Sekolah Demokrasi: Schooling youths in democracy

17 November, 2014 0 Comments

Sekolah Demokrasi, or its literal translation ‘Democratic School’ is a political empowerment camp for youths interested in politics and social democracy in Malaysia. Cybertroopers have zoomed in on the Malay participants of this DAP training camp, calling them names like “betrayers of their race”, accusing them of forgetting their roots, ... Full Article →