Closing the gap

29 June, 2012

Since 2008, Pakatan Rakyat’s team of newly-minted representatives have worked hard to close the gap between Penangites and their government. Partnering with civil society to bring about a cleaner, greener Penang is a goal Chow Kon Yeow intends to see through in the next election. Izmil Amri asks the Penang DAP Chairman how decentralisation will boost Penang’s transport master plan.

 

Tanjung’s Trooper

After completing his studies at Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) in social sciences, KL-born Chow Kon Yeow stayed on in Penang. In the 1986 general elections, he was appointed as politicl secretary to Lim Kit Siang, who was then struggling for the ‘Battle of Tanjung’.

He won the Pengkalan Kota state seat in 1990. He lost it in 1995 but prevailed in the Tanjung parliamentary seat in 1999. He succesfully defended Tanjung in 2008 and is currently Penang DAP Chairman.

 

The Rocket: What exactly is the Penang Transport Master Plan?

Chow: This plan is spearheaded by non-governmental organizations invited to the Penang Transport Council and other individuals playing an active role in the community. This is among the efforts to increase community involvement in governmental planning; by holding public consultations to get feedback from the public.

Traffic congestion in Penang is a longstanding problem, and the transport master plan is designed based on expert advice from Australia to address this problem.

Compounding this existing problem is the limited power granted to states in matters of transport. What we need is decentralization of power from Federal to state, so that we (the state government) can do even more. It is difficult now because of whatever we want to do to improve traffic must pass through Putrajaya.

If we want to ask for additional buses, we must go through Putrajaya. In order to get taxi permits also we must go to Putrajaya. Enforcing the transport master plan also must be with the agreement of Putrajaya. We are fortunate that the Second Bridge is the result of an agreement between the governments of Malaysia and China, if not it will also be made into a problem by Putrajaya.

When Pakatan Rakyat takes over Putrajaya, we will implement decentralization of state power to allow local authorities to exercise more power and budgetary provisions to do what is good for people.

The Rocket: Speaking of local authorities, what took the State Assembly four years to pass the bill on local government elections?

Chow: We have received advice from the more senior members of state government about the need to conduct local government elections. However, we do not have the authority to implement local elections. Federal law does not allow us to do that.

When we met the Election Commission (EC) to address this, they refused. We met with the Local Government Council, they also refused. When we (Pakatan Rakyat) presented the bill in the Assembly, the opposition (UMNO) staged a walkout.

Finally our legal advisers from the state government together with civil society activists including Yeo Yang Poh and Tommy Thomas suggested that we go to court for a judicial declaration to seek interpretation of the provisions of existing law. Only then, finally we passed that law in the Dewan.

However, the authority to conduct election is in the hands of the ECs. That’s why it took four years for us to pass the law on local government elections.

The Rocket: Talking about elections, as State Chairman of the Penang DAP, is the state DAP ready for the upcoming general elections?

Chow: We cannot say that we are really 100% ready. But yes, we’re ready to face elections at any time. We have no choice! (laughs)

DAP and Pakatan Rakyat Penang will carry the slogan ‘Penang; Clean, Green, Healthy and Safe’, which is not only to be taken literally. We want Penang not only to be physically clean, but also clean from corruption and abuse of power. Green is not only about the environment, but also the preserved position of Islam, as can be seen in the increase in the annual budget for Islamic affairs in Penang.

I think the ‘Ubah’ slogan is still relevant, even though we remain optimistic in still holding the mandate of the people for the DAP and Pakatan Rakyat in Penang. What still needs to be changed is the mentality of people who are yet to accept change, and what is more important is the continuing efforts to change at national scale, and take over Putrajaya.

The Rocket: What about the perception of the Malays against DAP, would that be the problem?

Chow: What people often forget is that in 1995, DAP fielded 14 Malay candidates to contest in the general election that year. And Pakatan Rakyat’s win in Penang is not because the votes of Chinese and Indians, but the Malay votes. Without the Malay votes, it is impossible for the tsunami to occur in March 2008.

Furthermore the relationship between PR component parties in Penang is good. Penang politics cannot be equated with national politics. We are ready to face all challenges.

The Rocket: Throughout your political struggle in Penang, and now as a State Executive Councillor, you have surely witnessed many changes. What can be said about these changes?

Chow: Throughout the history of Penang, the state only went through major changes in two general elections, first in 1969 and most recently in March 2008. The political tsunami that occurred in March 2008 not only resulted in political changes but also changes the way people think and their mindsets.

Penang people used to have a huge gap with the government, but now the Penang state government is doing its best to close the gap by listening to peoples’ voice and opinion. This, among other factors, including UMNO hegemony, is the reason why the people chose to vote for the opposing parties of Barisan Nasional in March 2008, which has now formed the Pakatan Rakyat.

In addition we must also look to the national scenario which saw civil society re-emerging with a variety of activities, thus the Penang state government always sought to establish partnerships with organizations in developing programs for the people of Penang, like the Cleaner Greener Penang campaign.

The Rocket: How has public acceptance been for efforts towards change led by Pakatan Rakyat?

Chow: We always try to change the way how Penang people think so that have a sense of belonging towards the state. What is important is that there is positive reaction and energy from the people. For instance the ‘My Penang My Pride’ program holds many gotong royong activities in order to instil a sense of affection for the state. We want the public to participate in government programs, we want to take their views into account, just like we did for the Penang Transport Master Plan. -The Rocket

This article was written by on Friday, June 29, 2012 at 5:21 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →