Budget 2011: Equipping the Workforce

5 October, 2010

By T.K. Tan

October is the month for budgetary number crunching again. It is time to reflect on what those numbers mean for us. It looks rosy on paper; the economy is still humming, with GDP growth expected to be more than six percent this year and with unemployment at a healthy 3.4 percent for the second quarter of 2010. But is our economy resting on firm foundations?

In light of the Tenth Malaysia Plan (10MP) and New Economic Model (NEM) launched this year, where will Budget 2011 fit in with these master plans?  In the NEM, the National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC) has set the target for Malaysia’s economy to grow at 6.5% per annum in order to achieve per capita GNP of RM54,800 (USD17,700) by 2020, which would propel us to the high income economy status.  As for the 10MP, as an intermediate blueprint, it calls for Malaysia to achieve RM38,845 (USD12,139) by 2015.

For the economy to achieve high income status, it needs skilled workers. As stated in the NEM report, 75 percent of the country’s workforce are unskilled workers, with 80 percent of the workers having an education of SPM or less. When compared with South Korea (35 percent skilled labour and more than 25 percent with some form of post secondary education) and Taiwan (33 percent skilled labour), it clearly shows we have a long way to go.

A peek at the issues
In the 10MP, the government has proposed that RM150 million be used to train 20,000 school dropouts and RM7.5 million to train their coaches. Is this enough? A quick tabulation shows:

1) At an average of RM7,500 per person and assuming  RM500 per month for the course fees and  15 months of training, is it adequate to train a person to have skills that will churn out products worth millions?

2) At RM7.5 million, assuming 500 instructors (for one instructor per 40 students), which means RM15,000 per instructor, is it adequate to train them in sufficient time (assuming 30 months) so that they are qualified to teach the trainees?
In addition, there would surely be more than 20,000 dropouts in a year. Does the government intend to provide training for them?

Polytechnics and community colleges play an important role in training skilled workers. In the previous budget, RM612 million were allocated for polytechnics and community colleges compared with RM6.88 billion for public universities. With the workforce being overwhelmingly low-skilled and unequipped, there seems to be a mismatch of priorities in attention and resources given for educating workers.  And yet there is only a brief mention in the 10MP of recognising Technical Education and Vocational Training (TEVT) for strengthening technical post secondary education.

Tertiary education
Malaysia is expected to have 1.5 million university students in 2010, which is close to nine percent of the total 16 million workers in the country. However, the local universities seem to be churning out quantity, not quality graduates. The take-up rate for graduates has been hovering around 50 percent from 2006 to 2009, compared with 82 percent in Singapore. There needs to be a rethinking of the education approaches and priorities in our local universities.

The government is spending generously on scholarships; from 2000 to 2009, first degree scholarships spent increased from RM221 million to RM865 million. However, these talents have yet to be fully utilised by government; statistics shows that from 2003 to 2007, only 16 percent of the Public Service Department (JPA) scholars have served their bonds and worked in the civil service. The current incentive scheme is not working in retaining them.

For those with Higher Education Loan Funds Public (PTPTN), there is motivation on the part of the borrowers to follow through their studies and work in their related fields so as to maximise their income potential. The government’s reinstatement of the waiver of PTPTN for top students in 2010 (it was ceased in 2005) is commendable; however, what of those who graduated in the years 2006-2009? Many of them felt demoralised by the government’s flip-flopping policy. Would they and future graduates have trust in the government and the country?

Foreign talent
One of the areas identified by the NEAC to speed up the country’s alleviation of knowledge and skilled worker shortage is attracting foreign talent. The government has commendably begun to restructure the country’s expatriate policies. Some of theses incentives, however, seem piecemeal.  For example, in the 10MP, there is no time limit for employment visa for skilled foreign workers earning more than RM8,000 per month. What if there are workers who are willing to work for less than RM8,000 but their skill is critical for the particular sector?

Another example is foreign professionals only being allowed to buy houses worth more than RM250,000. This would prevent them from buying many types of condominiums and apartments, which are easier to maintain and dispose off for a foreigner.
A further unproductive policy is the liberal intake of foreign migrant workers into the country. Their presence continues to serve as a pressure on local wage rates. As most of the migrant workers take up menial jobs in the country, uneducated locals are forced to accept pitiful salaries.

Centre for Policy Initiatives (CPI) researcher Jayanath Appudurai  estimates that the poverty level income calculation should be at RM1,886 per household, and not at RM800 as per the government’s calculation.  This would mean that instead of the official 3.8 percent, Malaysia’s actual poverty rate is closer to 31 percent of households. That means a substantial number of people are barely earning to sustain themselves, much less to upgrade themselves.

Moving Forward
The solutions are as much in the details as the issues raised. The government should look to provide and strengthen the courses in community colleges and polytechnics for lifelong learning and skills. The retraining courses should not just be for school dropouts, but anyone with some working background. Our polytechnics amd community colleges also need more funding, to commensurate with the aim to train higher skilled workers.

The DAP Economic Bureau has proposed to enforce stricter scholarship bond obligation (with non-fulfilling graduates to pay full amount of scholarship at market interests rate) and to improve incentive for graduates to stay in Malaysia. Additionally, it has also proposed that merit-based government scholarships be given for the top 6,000 students in country.

However, with the ongoing politicking, the government will most likely run into trouble with Perkasa and react by dragging its foot. Regardless, the proof of this government’s determination to reform this country’s economic foundations will be shown here. A failure to resolve it will prolong Malaysia’s economic doldrums and lack of competitiveness, well-crafted Budget or not. -The Rocket

This article was written by on Tuesday, October 5, 2010 at 11:18 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. Tags:

Comments are closed.

Other News

Burying our dead – working with or against Putin?

21 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Mohamad Ariff Sabri, Raub MP Maybe it is too much of watching Cao Cao and Zhuge Liang. I am constantly looking for some alternative explanations to what seems so obvious. In the downing and brutal shooting down of MH17, the world is quick to point its finger to Putin, ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 1)

22 July, 2014 0 Comments

Malaysian political satire, while existing in the media, has been branded as being insolent to the ruling government with the existence of laws that have freedom of speech under its clutches, threatening to poison the very essence of our nation’s democracy. The few who do create art that pokes fun ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →