BN to Lose at Least 10 Sarawak Seats in the Next General Election

14 May, 2011

By Liew Chin Tong

Besides doubling the number of seats held in this election, PR’s great success lies in reducing BN’s popular vote from 63% in 2006 to the current paltry 55%. Based on the results of this state election, it is forecasted that at least 10 parliamentary seats will fall to PR in the next General Election.

In Kidurong (Bintulu), DAP incumbent Chiew Chin Sing won by a large majority despite the constituency comprising only 52.5% Chinese voters. This shows the level of Iban support for DAP as well in the semi-urban constituencies of Meradong, Dudong and Batu Kawah. The increased level of Iban support shows that DAP is moving beyond Chinese support and is increasingly being accepted by all races.

Money Politics No Longer Foolproof

Secondly, money politics is no longer able to ensure victory in every case. SUPP’s campaign demonstrated an ignorant policy of ‘business as usual’ and assumed they would continue to have a monopoly on Sarawak. Against insurmountable odds, DAP managed to defeat several ‘Goliaths’ in several areas such as SUPP president George Chan and tycoon Tiong Thai King. This victory belongs to the people. Across the board of urban and rural areas, results point to the people’s rejection of money politics. Despite digging deep into their coffers, BN did not manage to buy a thumping victory as DAP won 12 out of 19 of the seats it contested.

Taib’s Influence Waning

Thirdly, Taib’s power is waning. His falling influence can be surmised from the secretive manner in which he was hurriedly sworn in the middle of the night immediately after the election victory was declared. The enduring question remains: will BN fulfil its promise of letting Taib go? BN is stuck between a rock and a hard place. If Taib remains at the helm, BN may lose more seats during the General Election. Will the election be held before or after Taib leaves?

1 Malaysia – Different Packaging, Same Disastrous Policies

Things changed after Hishamuddin’s keris-raising incident during the 2005 UMNO General Assembly, which endorsed the resurgence of the Malay agenda and the call for the reinvigorated implementation of the New Economic Policy. This caused alarm in the Chinese community and marked the beginning of the decline in Chinese support for BN. Post 2005, the entire discourse turned very much racial. Although BN claims that it does not need to rely on the minority vote, history has proved otherwise.

Najib’s 1 Malaysia is meant to appease this racialised discourse, but it is a mere smokescreen for the same tired approach. The economy as it stands today does not produce real growth and is artificially propped up by a strong public sector. Growth is channeled from sectors that do not generate much employment. The rakyat suffer. The economy is unable to grow, leading to inflation and an ever-widening divide between the rich and the poor. The slogan may have changed, but the status quo has not changed, except to say that the rakyat are in a far worse position today.

DAP’s Modern Campaigning Methods Strike Gold

The evolution of DAP campaigning methods and the increasingly important role of young people can be perceived from the recently concluded Sarawak state election. In the past decade or so, a shift can be detected in DAP’s campaigning methods. The party’s attempts to be more people-friendly have led to the rise of female candidates, popular use of modern posters, party mascots like the Rocket Kid and Ubah, t-shirts and other memorabilia.

There was a discernable ‘concert-type’ atmosphere in the DAP campaign which won the hearts of young people. Culturally relevant songs such as “Change”, and “I Believe” captured the imagination of the younger generation. By engaging the young people at the prime of their lives, it is a golden opportunity to grab their loyalty for life.

Females and young people are two demographics where BN is not strongly able to attract their support. BN’s use of outsourced advertising agencies to run its campaign advertisements has also proven to be an Achilles heel as the outsourced agencies were off the mark as far as popular public sentiment is concerned. This resulted in a campaign that was disjointed and with no coherent theme between candidates in different areas. During this recent Sarawak election, each SUPP candidate seemed to be running his own personal campaign. Even with their deep pockets, the BN campaign was unable to achieve the same level of genuine public popularity as the DAP’s campaign.

Instead of hiring one-off consultants for the campaign, DAP relied on in-house and home grown talents – often very young – who work alongside party workers year in, year out. With this DAP was able to run a successful media and public relations campaign that was much more coordinated, consistent and unified in purpose and approach.

By daring to try new methods and embracing pop culture, DAP was able to win over many voters who have grown tired of the staid government media campaigns that feel far removed from their daily lives. -The Rocket

This article was written by on Saturday, May 14, 2011 at 12:18 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. Tags:

Comments are closed.

Other News

The story behind parliamentary written replies

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

By Lu Wei Hoong Early last month, PKR’s Bagan Serai MP N Surendran slammed the institution of Parliament as “a waste of money”, because recent events have shown that it merely acts as a “rubber stamp” for the government of the day. To members of the media who cover the ... Full Article →

Artist Zunar, relentless fighter against tyranny (Part 2)

23 July, 2014 0 Comments

(…continuation from part 1) Since 2009, we still haven’t seen other cartoonists who shine other than yourself. Why is that so? Ok. With regard to this, I can only provide the space and guidance for cartoonists, I wont be able to turn them into successful cartoonists. That is for themselves ... Full Article →

Thank you, veterans! Because of you, DAP prevails

2 April, 2014 0 Comments

On 2 March, Penang Chief Minister and DAP MP for Bagan Lim Guan Eng hosted a private dinner in honor of the Penang state DAP veterans. There are over 120 veterans in the state who have been party members for over 30 years. Of the number, about 70 turned up ... Full Article →

What’s wrong with the Terengganu crisis?

5 June, 2014 0 Comments

by Political Studies for Change (KPRU) Election fever has become a phenomenon in this equatorial country ever since the March 8 political tsunami, which has changed the political landscape, though the political transformation has not completed yet. To a certain extent, each legislature at federal and state level has put a different complexion on politics. The recent Terengganu political crisis and the storming of the Penang state assembly by UMNO members have to do with legislative politics. Legislative politics is different from election politics. From the parliament to legislature assembly in each state, the most frequent question that has been asked by people is about the attendance of members of elected representative, and as for some other incidents that have happened in legislature they have merely formed a part of their memory as people might find them obscure. Obscurity has become a byword for these pieces of memory due to the fact that people might not have the foggiest about these floating debris of memory. The most unforgettable legislative incident to the people goes to the seizure of power in the Perak state, and despite that, people did not necessarily follow on all the details and issues arising from the incident of seizing power in Perak state. This time - the Terengganu crisis is not only a political crisis, but also a ‘legislative crisis’. The lack of pressure from people in Terengganu lies in the insufficient knowledge about legislative which has saved Najib Razak’s shaky hold on power, as well as the dying Terengganu political and legislative crises from the jaws of death. The incident got serious. Media started to report extensively and non-UMNO members in BN also thought that it was a red flag. However, from the Prime Minister Najib’s statement announcing that the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin had consented to the resignation of Ahmad Said as well as the appointment of Ahmad Razif Abd Rahman as the new Terengganu Menteri Besar; to the dramatic twist of events where Ahmad Said and and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party and then later returned to the party, there appeared an unification in media reporting of the incident from the preparedness to deal with the incidents from different angles. As stability wins over anything else, water leaves behind no trails in its path. From Najib’s statement on 12th May 2014 to the new Menteri Besar Ahman Razif’s taking of oath of office before Sultan Mizan; and to the former Menteri Besar Ahmad Said’s announcement made at his official residence in Kemaman as to his decision to withdraw his resignation from UMNO, the whole process took shorter than two days. Nonetheless, all of the incidents that have occurred in the midst of the Terengganu crisis must not be dismissed out of hand, particularly when comes to the interpretation of matters involving legislative, which calls for some clarification and so that when similar event takes place in future, people in the particular state would no longer stay static in the face of the crisis. This Terengganu crisis, after Ahmad Said and two other UMNO state assemblymen quited the party, left Barisan Nasional with 14 state seats, against Pakatan Rakyat’s 15 in the assembly, giving an equation of 15:14:3, with 3 being the “independent reps”. On the same day, that is, 13th May, the Terengganu state legal advisor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, when contacted by Bernama, has claimed that despite the fact that the number of BN assemblymen had dropped from 17 to 14, the state assembly Speaker was counted as a representative of the ruling state government, thereby giving an equation of 15:15:3. It was Wesak day, which is also a public holiday. After founding director of think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU), Ooi Heng and his family offered prayers in a Buddhist temple and after he came across Azhar’s misleading statement, Ooi Heng shared his personal view on Facebook, taking the view that the Speaker shall have the casting vote only when the voting comes down to a tie. After talking to a journalist, Ooi Heng is even convinced that the real reason behind Terengganu state legal advisor making misleading statement was to buy some time for UMNO’s political power, so as to resolve the political and legislative crisis. The Federal Constitution has given exposition on legislative power, which includes both parliament and state assembly, and under which the Speaker’s voting right is also covered. The Federal Constitution is basically modeled on the Westminster parliamentary system. Schedule 8, Paragraph 10 (1B) of the Federal Constitution makes it clear that the Speaker of legislative assembly who is not an elected representative has no voting power. Whereas according to the Article 27 (1B) of the Constitution of Terengganu, non-member of the Assembly elected as Speaker has no voting right. Terengganu assembly speaker, Mohd Zubir Embong, is not an elected representative, as he was appointed as assembly speaker on 16th June 2013 after being defeated in the election for Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. Hence, the controversy over the question of whether the speaker’s vote can be counted shall not even arise. In fact, not only does the state assembly follow the Westminster legislative custom, but the parliament of Malaysia is also following the system. The Article 57 (1A) of the Federal Constitution clearly provides that any person elected as Speaker of the House of Representatives who is not a member of the House of Representatives has no voting right. Furthermore, according to the Standing Order 45(1), the speaker shall be entitled to give his deciding ballot only when the voting comes down to a tie where ayes are equal to noes. This deciding ballot can be known as the casting vote, or ‘undi pemutus’ in Malay. The aim of this article is to clear doubts on this legislative incident, and as far as the Speaker’s voting right is concerned, no critical comment is intended to be directed at the roles that both government and the opposition have played in this political power crisis. However, I am of the opinion that despite the misleading statement by the state legal advisor, government and opposition elites should still be held responsible politically for this legislative incident. It is indeed bizarre that both government and opposition have no idea about the legislative procedures in the Terengganu state assembly when most of the assembly members are from UMNO and PAS. In the two days within which the 3 UMNO state assemblymen became ‘independent reps’ (Less than 48 hours), Terengganu state assembly has actually been beset with crisis. While there was likely UMNO fall down in Terengganu, UMNO has nonetheless got themselves some time to stabilise their shaky hold on power. Apart from UMNO taking the lead in this incident, the fact that PAS was being indifferent to the misleading statement will go down in the history of legislative politics. History is bound to repeat when political elite’s political action has not been properly examined. -The Rocket * The views expressed in this article are the personal opinion of the columnist ... Full Article →